(24-01-2022, 11:12 PM)martin_argentina Wrote: Dear Jorgen and e65 members,
I have also written this explanation previously: a forensic analyst would have no doubt that the greeting of the 3rd Telegram channel has nothing to do with the writing style of Mike.
By "rudely" I referred to the way the imitator tried to copy the writing style of Mike. Nothing else.
Martin you nor I or anybody else reading this fora is a forensic analyst, and for that simple reason, your statement is at the best useless.
Next, let's say I want to send you a letter and I want to make sure you don't recognize my writing style, what could I do? I could hire someone to write for me, and I would still be the one behind the message.
Either way, Mike still has to pay rent, electricity, phone, internet, food, transport, etc. just like everybody else, and with no income other than scamming people, then it easily could be Mike that is behind.
Once again NO ONE can prove it is Mike who is behind and on the other hand, NO ONE can prove that it is NOT Mike that is behind the Telegram texts!
And that is a fact!!
